Connecting People to Applications | W3i

Archive for the 'Customer Acquisition' Category

Jackpot Rewards® Joins the W3i Application Network

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

JackpotW3iCombo 

Jackpot Rewards Selects W3i for Consumer App Distribution

St. Cloud, Minnesota, February 9, 2010 – W3i, provider of marketing solutions that increase distribution, revenue, and engagement for consumer applications, announced today that Jackpot Rewards is now part of the W3i Application Network.  Jackpot Rewards, a sweepstakes and shopping rewards program, is using the W3i Application Network as a new application distribution channel for its free Jackpot Rewards application.

“The W3i Application Network provides a mass distribution channel for companies with consumer applications that are seeking customer acquisition beyond paid search and social media,” said Rob Weber, VP of Business Development at W3i.  “Jackpot Rewards recognizes the opportunity the W3i Application Network offers to grow its membership by expediting the discovery of its free shopping and sweepstakes application to millions of new users.”

Jackpot Rewards has a new and unique shopping and sweepstakes product for consumers, called “Shop to Win”.  “Shop to Win” is free to consumers and gives them the chance to win $500 a day and a $100,000 Jackpot for every $5 they spend at over 2,000 leading online retailers. 

“W3i’s distribution capabilities give us the opportunity to dramatically increase our memberships with a trusted partner,” said Jim Miller, the CEO and Founder of Jackpot Rewards. “We are excited about the results to date and look forward to a long-term relationship with W3i.” 

 About W3i: 

W3i increases revenue, distribution and engagement for consumer applications and plug-ins. W3i uses a network approach combining the demand for free applications monetized by the distribution of relevant applications when the consumer is in the installation mindset.  The W3i Application Network uses Install IQ, W3i’s proprietary Windows installation manager, the first installer to be certified in the TRUSTe Trusted Download Program.  Tested and optimized on over 350 million installs–currently 9.6 million installs monthly, W3i will prove to be a valued distribution partner in growing your consumer application business. To learn more, visit the W3i Application Network.

Press Contact:

Deborah Manthei

Director of Marketing Communications

320-257-7571

deborah.manthei@W3i.com

The names of companies and products mentioned herein are trademarks of their respective owners.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Sphinn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • NewsVine
  • Design Float
  • Yahoo! Buzz

How the Evolution of Software Bundling has Affected Software Distribution, and How to Apply to Your Application Business

Friday, January 8th, 2010

The blogosphere is covered with posts that would have us believe that desktop applications and software are already dead (cloud, mobile, SaaS); however, retail sales for desktop applications and software are a multi-billion dollar industry. In April 2009, the NPD Group reported that PC software retail sales were around $3.4B per year and holding steady. The major change, however, is the impact the web is having on how desktop applications and software are distributed.  According to NPD, web application and software distribution has increased from 11.5% to 17% in the last 4 years.

Following I explain how the web has influenced software bundling.  I start with a brief background of OEM software bundling.  Next I discuss a new type of software distribution that we call recommendation based distribution, and conclude with answers to frequently asked questions regarding recommendation based distribution.

Software Bundling

Software providers (OEM – original equipment manufacturer) for decades leveraged value-added resellers (VARs) for driving sales of their software as part of a hardware/software package.  These marketing partnerships result in what is often referred to as a “bundle” due to the fact that complementary services are bundled together.

A common example is a new computer that includes Microsoft Windows®.  A few other applications routinely bundled include Office®, security, internet browser, and toolbar applications. 

This type of distribution is big business.  Here are a few examples:

  1. HP & WildTangent – WildTangent became an immediate force in the casual game world because of the huge bundle distribution agreements that they signed.
  2. Storage devices bundled with back-up software such as Carbonite with Seagate and Memeo with Western Digital Technologies.

User acceptance over the practice varies based on the type of users a VAR sells to as well as the quality and quantity of applications that they bundle. The two primary concerns raised by consumers are system performance and the nuisance of removing unwanted software.

Recommendation Based Distribution

Is software bundling fundamentally flawed?  Do users want to receive a more affordable package by having additional software marketed to them?

Now that many users are connected to the web, software can be merchandised effectively without preloading on the users’ systems in advance.  W3i research showed that software bundling is not fundamentally flawed.  Users are however, most receptive to receiving software offers if they are involved in the application selection process.  Users can see recommendations for other applications when they first run a new computer, attach a new external device, or download an application from the web.  The recommendations can call out to the web to retrieve the files required for presenting the recommendations, downloading, and installing.

W3i to facilitate this process created its own proprietary technology, InstallIQ, which supports a fully web-capable solution allowing us to create a software distribution experience that resembles an online shopping experience. 

Here is an example of a website, Wallpapers.com, that runs InstallIQ during installation:

Wallpapers.com using InstallIQ

Note the consistency between the initial website and continued branding through the installation process.  We call this feature installer skinning.  By leveraging the website’s brand equity and style in the installer we create a transparent and consistent experience that enhances usability and increases conversions (see our post Creating Consistency to Increase Conversions).

The same flexible technology is used to improve the presentation of software to users:

Presentation and Control InstallIQ

Notice above that the user has a clear and consistent navigation experience.  This navigation style was influenced by a case study, published by TRUSTe, as well as improvements such as a shopping cart feature that was added based on user feedback.  The cart shows specifically what applications were accepted followed by a check-out process where the user can review all of their selected applications and change their selections before the process is completed. 

Some providers struggle with clear and consistent navigation because it is challenging working with their existing installation packaging technologies.  Their user navigation requires very different buttoning when a recommendation is presented. This is something I like to call “opt-irritating”.

In summary, the web is enabling an evolution in software distribution and software bundling.  It is so different from how VARs bundled in the past that we feel a more appropriate category descriptor, for this methodology is recommendation based distribution.

Frequently asked questions

  • Is this business model right for my software?  How will my users respond?

Software with a low propensity for users to purchase have the most to gain. Frequently, developers are experimenting with multiple business models and a hybrid approach wins out. For example, a leading security application offers a free light version which gets heavy downloads, generates revenue from advertising using installer recommendations, and later pitches premium paid services to its users.

The response by users vary greatly from one implementation to another. A software or application provider’s reputation is highly influenced by the quality of software they provide. Distribute high quality software which is monetized through a high quality bundle experience and users can and will be very satisfied.

W3i has an experienced staff that works closely with software providers to define the solution which best suits their needs, including support on decisions such as the:  

    • Customizable look and feel
    • Select which, and how many, applications you want to recommend
    • Determine when you want to present the recommendations, whether it is with new installations or with special upgrades
    • Data-driven recommendations for optimization
  • Who should I form a marketing partnership with?

Most consumers and developers are in agreement that security and trustworthiness are key when choosing a marketing partner.  Users’ trust is earned by providers who define, educate, and simplify the process so users can effectively take control.

There are a few techniques you might consider when selecting marketing partners.  How recognized are their brands? How useful is their software to your users? What comments, reviews, or ratings have been written about them? Ask your users what they think about the partner or think about how your user persona would most likely respond.  What commitment do they make in educating users about their practices and policies?  Do they have any third party validation and monitoring in place such as certification in the TRUSTe Trusted Download program?

Brands continue to play a key role.  Partners should stand behind their practices with full disclosure and branding.  They should proudly make visible who their marketing partners are instead of burying themselves in a privacy policy or by engineering their technology so it cannot be distinguished on its own.  Be cautious of providers with little or no reputation or experience.  If very few people say something positive or negative about them and they have significant distribution volumes, it says something about their commitment to creating awareness with their users.

  • How many additional offers should I present in any single installation?

W3i conducted a test where 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 offers were tested.  The results showed that the quantity had a minimal impact and that the relevancy of the offers was more important.  Relevancy impacts whether the user will complete the installation of the software, keep and use the software, and whether they will accept offers.

Be sure to consider not only how many offers you distribute but whether or not you will allow the offers to include other offers in their updates or a subsequent run process.  W3i’s policy, which it enforces, prohibits advertisers from promoting additional offers.  Some companies say they only distribute one offer but they do not have policies against what their advertisers distribute and so in reality, users that accept a single offer actually end up getting pitched more than one offer, often within moments of downloading and installing.

As you can see online recommendation based distribution borrows from but also significantly enhances software bundling to make it more appealing to users. The solution continues to evolve but the basics laid out above are the foundation for successful online software distribution.

By mastering recommendation based distribution, your applications can leverage a proven model that enables you to be relevant through effective distribution and monetization.

Get more in-depth information about software or application distribution through W3i’s blog, newsletter, or reaching out to us directly.

Ryan Weber, Vice President of Corporate Strategy & Co-Founder, W3i, LLC
Entrepreneur and pioneer of Internet marketing focusing on increasing revenue and distribution for digital downloads.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Sphinn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • NewsVine
  • Design Float
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Add-On-Con Recap: Buzz on Browser Add-On Distribution Channels: Part 3

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

To continue with my Add-on-Con buzz for marketers and developers of browser add-ons.  My last two postings recapped how browsers plan to lead all application platforms and the buzz on browser add-on business models.  In this post, I will cover the Add-On-Con buzz on add-on distribution channels. 

Add-On Distribution Channels

Browser galleries  

  • Firefox’s gallery (AMO) is the leading source of distribution for most add-on developers.W3i booth
  • Firefox announced they do not have plans to have sponsored ads on AMO right now.
  • Firefox revealed AMO’s install referrals come from these three primary sources – top ranked, recommended, and searched for
  • Add-ons are by default sorted by popularity (cumulative installs) but will be updated to use # of active users.
  • Alex Jeung, from Cooliris, mentioned that as a developer you can help your chances of getting recommended within the galleries by establishing your add-on’s popularity outside of the gallery and thereby proving that there is demand for your add-on.

Other distribution channels

A special thanks to AdaptiveBlue, Yoono, and OneRiot for organizing Add-On-Con.  The excitement and anticipation I had leading up to the event were not let down.  I would invite others to participate in next year’s conference and follow their soon to be released blog

Please consider following W3i to stay up to date with other market information about add-ons as well as related services provided by W3i. (Twitter, LinkedIn,  Newsletter, Blog).

Ryan Weber, Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Co-Founder, W3i, LLC
Entrepreneur and pioneer of Internet marketing focusing on increasing revenue and distribution for digital downloads.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Sphinn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • NewsVine
  • Design Float
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Don’t Overlook Software Libraries, like download.com, as a Consumer Software Distribution Tactic

Wednesday, December 9th, 2009

When looking to distribute free consumer software, there are many different methods of distribution.  Some of the more successful distribution methods are:

  • Online marketing promotions
  • Affiliate programs
  • Physical distribution through retail
  • Word of mouth

If you can get all the software distribution you need from the latter, then this blog post probably isn’t for you. But for the rest of us who can’t ever get enough, here’s a tactic that tends to get overlooked -software aggregators. 

There are many benefits to hosting your free software or trial software on sites like Download.com, Tucows.com and Softonic.com.  One of the most important things to look for when researching software aggregators is reputation, look for companies like Softonic.com that are a trusted source of downloads. If it’s not a trusted site don’t use it!  Many software aggregators  offer multiple benefits such as:

  • Free listing programs
  • Pay per download (PPD) programs at very reasonable rates
  • Scalable bandwidth  

Listing your downloads with software aggregators can free up bandwidth.  If your product has a large file size or high traffic influxes, these sites have the ability to provide unlimited downloads to potential users without the worry of servers crashing and bandwidth overage charges.

Working with software aggregators does come with a couple of caveats.  The first is turnaround time.  This problem is mostly caused by us–marketers, developers, etc.  Due to the high volume of requests for listings on these popular aggregators, turnaround times can be days or weeks.  It can also take the same amount of time when you’re trying to remove a product from the site.  Be sure to plan ahead.

The second is the lack of reporting.  You don’t get much visibility into reporting, so before adding this method of distribution to your marketing strategy, be sure to know your Key Performance Indicators (KPI) so you have the ability to optimize.

And now the W3i plug! Apart from software aggregators there is another tool available to you to increase distribution; it’s advertising in the installer.  W3i has created a proprietary Application Network where the advertiser’s popular consumer applications are offered during the installation process.  This distribution method is performance-based and user generated.      

Just like when football coaches tell their players to keep their heads on a swivel, the same can be said for marketers of this generation.  There are many different vehicles of software distribution that you can use to get your software in front of consumers. Just make sure the vehicle you choose fits your marketing strategy and instead of telling you to think outside the box, because I hate that cliché, I will suggest that you work smarter, not harder, when trying to find new vehicles of distribution.

Mitch Bain, Marketing Manager; W3i, LLC
Mitch has 4 years experience focusing on Display Advertising, Search Engine Marketing, and Mobile Marketing, in the Integrated Interactive Media industry.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • PDF
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Sphinn
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • NewsVine
  • Design Float
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Back to W3i.com

Find Out More on How W3i Can Grow Your Consumer App Business

Please complete the form below and a W3i representative will contact you to discuss how the W3i Application Network can grow your consumer application business.

Subscribe

RSS Feed RSS Feed

RSS Feed Comment RSS Feed

W3i on twitter

Follow Us

Technorati

Add to Technorati Favorites

Search


You are currently browsing the archives for the Customer Acquisition category.

Archives

Categories